Commenting our includes/excludes filters is indeed sometimes important for later maintenance.
I just tested using ## or in fact any other non-existing path seems "tolerated" by FFS with neither errors nor stopped behaviour. Maybe not the cleanest solution but usable today.
Search found 3 matches
- 16 Oct 2022, 09:46
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Add a way to comment paths
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5413
- 16 Oct 2022, 09:39
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Feature request to allow removing Target files for Excluded filters
- Replies: 2
- Views: 385
Re: Feature request to allow removing Target files for Excluded filters
Great idea xCSxXenon, indeed it uses the excluded list inside FFS, "reverse it" and allows to identify and remove all those files. This is a very good workaround.
Thanks.
Thanks.
- 13 Oct 2022, 09:55
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Feature request to allow removing Target files for Excluded filters
- Replies: 2
- Views: 385
Feature request to allow removing Target files for Excluded filters
I understood searching the forum [1] that by design once you add Exclude filter paths existing target files are just ignored forever and left as they are (not removed). This may be desired in some cases.
But the way I use it is that I find additional path which I consider safe not to backup anymore ...
But the way I use it is that I find additional path which I consider safe not to backup anymore ...