Search found 3 matches
- 28 Jan 2024, 23:04
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: [FEATURE REQUEST] Comparision improvement
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1869
Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] Comparision improvement
Yes, agreed! Thanks again!
- 28 Jan 2024, 19:25
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: [FEATURE REQUEST] Comparision improvement
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1869
Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] Comparision improvement
>The first Comparison (based on date/size) would already have shown the files are NOT equal,
so why verify that based on Content?
My scenario:
- Windows has a bug that keep updating "modify date" on some files (I did a little research and found it to be the case mostly with .eml files). Then the ...
so why verify that based on Content?
My scenario:
- Windows has a bug that keep updating "modify date" on some files (I did a little research and found it to be the case mostly with .eml files). Then the ...
- 28 Jan 2024, 03:26
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: [FEATURE REQUEST] Comparision improvement
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1869
[FEATURE REQUEST] Comparision improvement
First option "1. Compare by File time and size" is fast, ok?
Second option "2. Compare by File content" is reliable, right?
Why not have an option that do both?
Somethin like that: Check all files using "option 1", then, with the result, re-check all "considered not equal" files contents ...
Second option "2. Compare by File content" is reliable, right?
Why not have an option that do both?
Somethin like that: Check all files using "option 1", then, with the result, re-check all "considered not equal" files contents ...