FreeFileSync Forum

Of course, the original functions cannot be changed in any way, because it will lead to incompatibility with habits! It is very dangerous!
Hope this non-default option can be added. Because I changed the filter conditions, there was too much redundant data.
There are too many files, and manual ...

No one can make all filtering rules perfect at once.
Changes are always made in this filtering rule.
This creates too much redundant data and files.
I don't think the FFS writers should sit idly by.
Please make FFS software more perfect!

Now it looks like the filter is acting on both sides.
Now let the filter apply only to the options on the left and find the excess files in the folder on the right and delete them.
Full mirror synchronization, achieved!
This does not break the original rule, but adds one more rule option.
The main ...

Do you plan to implement full mirror mode?It seems that many users are asking the same question.

Is a full mirror mode considered? Because many times the consideration of filtering is not complete, resulting in data redundancy.

How to ensure that the remote end is consistent with the local end after filtering rules are modified?

After mirror synchronization,
I re-modified the filtering rules,
but the remote end did not detect any files outside the rules!
Shouldn't mirror synchronization be exactly the same?
Or is there something wrong with my Settings?
I used the local disk D mirror to synchronize to the SFTP remote end ...