Sorry: and implementation of "restarting from break point" for syncing over
slow and unstable links would also be a must.
Search found 3 matches
- 08 Jul 2012, 05:11
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Is FreeFileSync true rsync synchonisation?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4917
- 08 Jul 2012, 05:07
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Is FreeFileSync true rsync synchonisation?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4917
Re: Is FreeFileSync true rsync synchonisation?
Suggestion: another alternative to client/server could be (crazy ideas but...)
to allow files above a certain limit (say 100Mb) to be "monitored" by way of
sequential hashes for each 1Mb that would be stored in a .FFS.db file in order
to find out which 1Mb segment had been changed and in that case ...
to allow files above a certain limit (say 100Mb) to be "monitored" by way of
sequential hashes for each 1Mb that would be stored in a .FFS.db file in order
to find out which 1Mb segment had been changed and in that case ...
- 08 Jul 2012, 04:53
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Is FreeFileSync true rsync synchonisation?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4917
Re: Is FreeFileSync true rsync synchonisation?
Any plans to implement a "client/server" switch that would allow for rsync /
delta type of transfers efficient over slow links? I regularly need to sync
PST files of 30Gb and even on a 100Mb link takes a lot of time, when only
100Kb or so has been changed.
As for the rest, the program is near ...
delta type of transfers efficient over slow links? I regularly need to sync
PST files of 30Gb and even on a 100Mb link takes a lot of time, when only
100Kb or so has been changed.
As for the rest, the program is near ...