FFS very slow. Other ways to copy 1.2TB of files?

Get help for specific problems
Posts: 13
Joined: 26 Jul 2021

m3110w

I'm using Ubuntu 22.04 on a laptop. Earlier today I started a FFS mirror job of my 1.2TB user files to an external USB-C connected spinning hard drive. FFS says the job will take 30 days. !!!! Also, while FFS was running, I was unable to start any other apps on my 40GB-RAM Ryzen 7 laptop. So naturally I stopped the FFS job. My main drive is a laptop internal 2TB nvme.

Is there a faster way to copy files to an external USB-C connected spinning hard drive? Should I use an USB-C connected external nvme drive instead? (I'll buy one if needed to get decent copy times.)

I'm thinking if I find a a faster way to copy files to the external drive, I'll use FFS to sync future jobs (which will be small and go very fast).
User avatar
Posts: 3606
Joined: 11 Jun 2019

xCSxXenon

SSDs will be faster than a spinning hard drive
Posts: 13
Joined: 26 Jul 2021

m3110w

Yes, I'm now researching that option. Looks like the way to go.
Posts: 943
Joined: 8 May 2006

therube

says the job will take 30 days
Obviously that cannot be correct (hopefully).
while FFS was running, I was unable to start any other apps
I'd be more concerned about that, why that was the case?
What was CPU usage during this time?

Pick a sampling of files & let FFS copy them to the external drive.
What kind of actual throughput are you getting?

Take the same set of files & copy them again, this time using cp -r (or some other utility on Linux).
What kind of actual throughput are you getting?

If it is the same, then likely nothing to do on the FFS end.


A slug of an external drive might just be a slug of a drive.
Perhaps a different drive (or different format, SSD) may give better throughput.
Posts: 20
Joined: 30 Oct 2023

Flowers4

I'm using nvme ssds now exclusively.

Just remember that if your computer doesn't have the internal hardware required to transfer at the faster speeds that these drives are capable of you will not see any advanced performance. I have pcie 3 and 4 in my computers, along with usb-c connectors.

My one older laptop that only has uSB 3 and older internal architecture only gets about 35 MB per second transferring to my super fast external hard drives.

The same hard drive when connected to my newer computers with the USBC and PCIe 3 and 4I get about 500 megabytes per second!

This software from https://www.cpuid.com/softwares/cpu-z.html will tell you if your computer has pci-e 3 or 4.
Posts: 943
Joined: 8 May 2006

therube

(My end says, PCI-Express 3.0 (8 GT/s).
I don't have (external) NVMe nor USB-C.
I do have, "supposedly", USB 3, of some sort, & a "flash" drive.
I get nowhere near 1 GB/s transfers ;-).)
Posts: 13
Joined: 26 Jul 2021

m3110w

I got FFS working now. I was going thru an Anker USB3 powered hub. That used to work for FFS syncs but apparently not anymore. I'll have to research why. I connected the HDD directly to my USB3 laptop and it worked. Took 16 hrs to do an initial first sync of 1.2TB of data to an empty HDD. Of course, once the first sync is done the subsequent syncs are a few seconds.

I was not able to determine why the earlier FFS sync froze my system cuz I was unable to start the SysMon app or any other app.

Issue resolved (mostly).
Last edited by m3110w on 04 Jan 2024, 01:15, edited 1 time in total.
Posts: 13
Joined: 26 Jul 2021

m3110w

How do I mark this issue as resolved?
User avatar
Posts: 3606
Joined: 11 Jun 2019

xCSxXenon

How do I mark this issue as resolved? m3110w, 04 Jan 2024, 01:13
You don't, it's just an open-ended thread. Although, it would be kind of cool to have something like GitHub/Microsoft where there is a dedicated page to issues and then each can have a jump-to link that goes to and highlights the answer.