I have a small LAN and I backup all PCs and some usb disks to one PC.
I have many source-target pairs in my file.
When I decide to sync, there is no guarantee that all PCs are on and all usb disks are mounted.
So, FFS marks for deletion all of coresponding target files.
SO:
If source directory is not available, skip sync. Don't delete target files.
If target directory is not available, skip sync. Don't delete source files.
Future Request: If either source OR target are not available don't sync
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 15 Feb 2006
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7211
- Joined: 9 Dec 2007
This functionality is already implemented. Is there a problem with it?
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 15 Feb 2006
I believe the same, but seems to be a problem.
I attach 2 screenshots of my 6.2 version (6.12 does the same thing).
I attach 2 screenshots of my 6.2 version (6.12 does the same thing).
- Attachments
-
- FFS.png (11.59 KiB) Viewed 886 times
-
- Clipboard-2.png (261.69 KiB) Viewed 886 times
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7211
- Joined: 9 Dec 2007
This problem is caught at a later stage: if you try to start sync you'll get the error "source folder not found".
- Posts: 2451
- Joined: 22 Aug 2012
@Zenju:
Suppose the resource that was off-line during Compare
does become on-line between the Compare and Sync action,
would that now pose a risk of loss of data in FFS?
Suppose the resource that was off-line during Compare
does become on-line between the Compare and Sync action,
would that now pose a risk of loss of data in FFS?
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7211
- Joined: 9 Dec 2007
No, because FreeFileSync checks folder existence only once: no matter if the device becomes visible later or not, starting sync will show a fatal error and skip the corresponding folder pair.@Zenju:
Suppose the resource that was off-line during Compare
does become on-line between the Compare and Sync action,
would that now pose a risk of loss of data in FFS?plerry