Search found 9 matches

by JC-RFC
23 Oct 2024, 12:32
Forum: Help
Topic: Windows File Attributes
Replies: 3
Views: 486

Re: Windows File Attributes

I would like to add my voice to this request.
After running snapraid I noticed a number of files with temp attribute set, same with system attribute set.
I changed them with nirsoft bulk file tool, but then FFS would not sync these changes to my backups.
I used robocopy to copy only attributes (and ...
by JC-RFC
12 Dec 2023, 21:16
Forum: Help
Topic: Fileid vs ObjectID for NTFS
Replies: 3
Views: 15527

Re: Fileid vs ObjectID for NTFS

Thanks for the reply Zenju,

My take on the MS documents is that FileID is a valid (and the best) mechanism for tracking files on NTFS, and I see why you wouldn’t bother with ObjectID if it doesn’t work with FAT anyway.

I agree that this should be addressed in Drivepool, thanks for your time.
by JC-RFC
12 Dec 2023, 11:20
Forum: Help
Topic: Fileid vs ObjectID for NTFS
Replies: 3
Views: 15527

Fileid vs ObjectID for NTFS

I have been working through a compatibility issue between FFS and Drivepool.

The Drivepool devs are suggesting that FileID may not be the best method for detecting file renames and moves on NTFS.

... incorrectly using File IDs as persistent file identifiers, which they should not be. File IDs in ...
by JC-RFC
12 Dec 2023, 11:16
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Moved & Renamed clarification for network locations.
Replies: 9
Views: 14715

Re: Moved & Renamed clarification for network locations.

I have discussed this with the devs of Drivepool and have the following response:



... incorrectly using File IDs as persistent file identifiers, which they should not be. File IDs in Windows can change from time to time on some filesystems.

Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows ...
by JC-RFC
07 Dec 2023, 11:29
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Moved & Renamed clarification for network locations.
Replies: 9
Views: 14715

Re: Moved & Renamed clarification for network locations.

Did some comprehensive testing on my actual setup and confirmed it's drivepool.

I have a Stablebit Drivepool D:, a network location \\HTPC and an external drive E:
Moving files works between E: and \\HTPC but not between D: and \\HTPC or D: and E:
The common denominator is that D: is a Drivepool ...
by JC-RFC
07 Dec 2023, 06:46
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Moved & Renamed clarification for network locations.
Replies: 9
Views: 14715

Re: Moved & Renamed clarification for network locations.

Ok, I did a quick test setup on another pair of networked computers and moved files works flawlessly in all directions. Whether one side was UNC or a mapped drive did not matter either.
Now to hunt down the issue on my main setup.
But for anyone searching this forum, yes Networked locations ...
by JC-RFC
05 Dec 2023, 21:54
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Moved & Renamed clarification for network locations.
Replies: 9
Views: 14715

Re: Moved & Renamed clarification for network locations.

Was planning to try that, will do and report back.
The documentation recommends UNC paths and I prefer them but be good to know if this makes the difference I agree.
by JC-RFC
05 Dec 2023, 05:30
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Moved & Renamed clarification for network locations.
Replies: 9
Views: 14715

Re: Moved & Renamed clarification for network locations.

Ok to clarify I have a sync rule of:
\\HTPC\Data <-> D:\
Note: \\HTPC\Data is a share on a remote machine that is sharing it's D:\ to the network
D:\ (The right hand side) is a drive pool on the local machine - The local machine name is Server.
This means the sync is effectively \\HTPC\D$ to ...
by JC-RFC
28 Nov 2023, 21:04
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Moved & Renamed clarification for network locations.
Replies: 9
Views: 14715

Moved & Renamed clarification for network locations.

Hi,

Terrific product.

I have searched everywhere but cannot find a definitive answer on moved/renamed when syncing between a local and a unc network location, both ntfs. I know the system uses file-id but I see some reports of people saying it works for their NAS connection and another comment on ...