You must be trolling, one more fish:
Source: C:/
Dest : D:/FolderDest
Search found 23 matches
- 26 Apr 2016, 07:50
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Copy the Root folder
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1360
- 25 Apr 2016, 16:42
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: [BUG] Portable installation is broken in v8.0
- Replies: 46
- Views: 35527
Re: [BUG] Portable installation is broken in v8.0
Works for me, you should probably be more specific about what doesn't work.
- 25 Apr 2016, 05:56
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Copy the Root folder
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1360
Re: Copy the Root folder
Source: C:/FolderSource
Dest : D:/FolderDest/FolderSource
Dest : D:/FolderDest/FolderSource
- 24 Apr 2016, 19:43
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: [BUG] Portable installation is broken in v8.0
- Replies: 46
- Views: 35527
Re: [BUG] Portable installation is broken in v8.0
Which limitation in 8.1 are you talking about?
- 24 Apr 2016, 19:34
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Exclude all, include *.txt
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1207
Re: Exclude all, include *.txt
Including *.txt and excluding nothing is sufficient. You are excluding everything from the subset of all .txt files.
- 22 Apr 2016, 07:59
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: [BUG] Portable installation is broken in v8.0
- Replies: 46
- Views: 35527
Re: [BUG] Portable installation is broken in v8.0
This rule will be relaxed again with 8.1 (release later today) to allow copying and using the portable version on systems other than the one where the installation occured and without having to install on a usb stick.Zenju
- 22 Apr 2016, 07:59
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Question: Installation Without Windows Admin Privilege?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3258
Re: Question: Installation Without Windows Admin Privilege?
Great news, thanks!
- 21 Apr 2016, 09:06
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Question: Installation Without Windows Admin Privilege?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3258
Re: Question: Installation Without Windows Admin Privilege?
Install it in portable mode on a different system (since 8.0 it will be bound to the installed system so use 7.9) or extract it with InnoUnp (8.0 won't work that way).
- 17 Apr 2016, 16:37
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Feature request: Make <WarnSignificantDifference> to be triggered with updated files as well
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2760
Re: Feature request: Make <WarnSignificantDifference> to be triggered with updated files as well
I see the benefit of a warning but I don't see a way to make it work reliably.
How do you set a practical threshold for the warning? 25%, 50% or 75% of files changed?
What if the ransomware just has started and only encrypted 15% of your files?
There is no way to detect unwanted changes in an ...
How do you set a practical threshold for the warning? 25%, 50% or 75% of files changed?
What if the ransomware just has started and only encrypted 15% of your files?
There is no way to detect unwanted changes in an ...
- 17 Apr 2016, 11:30
- Forum: Help
- Topic: CopyFileEx: Error Code 1392
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1645
Re: Error Code 1392
Your drive seems to have some corrupted sectors. What happens when copying these files manually from Explorer?
- 17 Apr 2016, 11:26
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Feature request: Make <WarnSignificantDifference> to be triggered with updated files as well
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2760
Re: Feature request: Make <WarnSignificantDifference> to be triggered with updated files as well
What about the preview? Don't you check the list for changes anyway? I don't just blindly hit "Synchronize".
- 11 Apr 2016, 18:06
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Paid for v7.9 a week before v8
- Replies: 2
- Views: 876
Re: Paid for v7.9 a week before v8
Donating is not paying, but you can donate as much as you want.
- 09 Apr 2016, 09:25
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Can I sync to the cloud with this tool?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 10945
Re: Can I sync to the cloud with this tool?
But why?! I'm sure there is no need for that since a simple symlink works in most scenarios:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTFS_symbolic_link
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTFS_symbolic_link
- 09 Apr 2016, 09:11
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Automate Sync
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2445
Re: Automate Sync
Dropbox and GDrive already sync in real-time so just link them:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTFS_symbolic_link
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTFS_symbolic_link
- 04 Apr 2016, 18:51
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Portable use problem
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1508
- 26 Mar 2016, 10:45
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Problem syncing with Android micro SD card
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3941
Re: Problem syncing with Android micro SD card
That's not quite true since the root of the problem is the Most Troublesome Protocol (MTP). Even the Windows Explorer is crashing when trying to copy/move/rename files on a MTP-device. Setting file dates is also problematic on WP:
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/mobiledevices/forum/mdlumia ...
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/mobiledevices/forum/mdlumia ...
- 26 Mar 2016, 09:17
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: [BUG] Portable installation is broken in v8.0
- Replies: 46
- Views: 35527
Re: [BUG] Portable installation is broken in v8.0
So here are my questions:
- what is the minimum donation to qualify for the safe version?
- are previous donors not eligible for the safe version?
- for how many future updates does a donation guarantee access to the safe version?
will I need to make another donation every time I want to get a ...
- what is the minimum donation to qualify for the safe version?
- are previous donors not eligible for the safe version?
- for how many future updates does a donation guarantee access to the safe version?
will I need to make another donation every time I want to get a ...
- 24 Mar 2016, 11:58
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: check for rename and relocate
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4707
Re: check for rename and relocate
You are right, I tested that several years ago and it seems to be outdated as everything is moved correctly now. Great job!FreeFileSync has no issues detecting moved files and folders, but this requires a database file as a reference.Zenju
- 24 Mar 2016, 11:45
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: [BUG] Portable installation is broken in v8.0
- Replies: 46
- Views: 35527
Re: [BUG] Portable installation is broken in v8.0
It all makes sense, thanks for the honest answer! I guess a clear statement on the ad-bundled setup would have been better in first place than just "Automatically check consistency of FreeFileSync installation" as a reason.
Too bad it's unusable as a portable app in cloud storage then, so I'll just ...
Too bad it's unusable as a portable app in cloud storage then, so I'll just ...
- 23 Mar 2016, 11:41
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: check for rename and relocate
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4707
Re: check for rename and relocate
Well it's not impossible to do it at all but it's quite hard to get it working reliably. It seems easy to make the right changes if you 'know" what has changed, while it's not as simple when you have to rely only on the snapshot of the previous file trees.
Some good programs have these feature but ...
Some good programs have these feature but ...
- 21 Mar 2016, 14:06
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: [BUG] Portable installation is broken in v8.0
- Replies: 46
- Views: 35527
Re: [BUG] Portable installation is broken in v8.0
No comment on the checks and source code? Are these questions inappropriate or just tiring?
- 18 Mar 2016, 14:17
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: [BUG] Portable installation is broken in v8.0
- Replies: 46
- Views: 35527
Re: [BUG] Portable installation is broken in v8.0
But I couldn't find the part handling this "install.dat" in source code
This part is handled in the installer, which is not open source. As for the installation failure, is this still reproducible? If yes, I'd like to analyze what's going on.
But FFS complains if the file is missing or its ...
This part is handled in the installer, which is not open source. As for the installation failure, is this still reproducible? If yes, I'd like to analyze what's going on.
But FFS complains if the file is missing or its ...
- 18 Mar 2016, 13:55
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: [BUG] Portable installation is broken in v8.0
- Replies: 46
- Views: 35527
Re: [BUG] Portable installation is broken in v8.0
Just for the record, I don't know what you are trying to hide, but apparently you secretly added some code to record (or collect?) user's information. What exactly it is for, we have no idea yet.
Because for this part of the code, you deliberately hid it and did not put into the source code you ...
Because for this part of the code, you deliberately hid it and did not put into the source code you ...