Search found 12 matches
- 07 Apr 2018, 08:04
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Make sync.ffs_db a system file
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1043
Re: Make sync.ffs_db a system file
Okay, thank you :)
- 05 Apr 2018, 08:47
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Make sync.ffs_db a system file
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1043
Re: Make sync.ffs_db a system file
Yes, I have tried that... But every time it synchronizes again, FFS make the sync.ffs_db a non-system file again.
Every time, there's a change in the database file.
But you mean, that I should put that in my .bat file? :)
Can you put the command line in a ffs_bacth file?
Every time, there's a change in the database file.
But you mean, that I should put that in my .bat file? :)
Can you put the command line in a ffs_bacth file?
- 05 Apr 2018, 06:46
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Make sync.ffs_db a system file
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1043
Re: Make sync.ffs_db a system file
Is there a chance for this?
Yes/No/Maybe? ;)
Best regards.
Yes/No/Maybe? ;)
Best regards.
- 10 Mar 2018, 09:10
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Make sync.ffs_db a system file
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1043
Make sync.ffs_db a system file
Hi Zenju.
I have a little "prayer" for you.
Would it be possible in a future version, to make it optional (like a checkmark in a square) or something like that,
to make the sync.ffs_db a "system file", not only a hidden file.
Many people have "show hidden files" in windows, activated.
But system ...
I have a little "prayer" for you.
Would it be possible in a future version, to make it optional (like a checkmark in a square) or something like that,
to make the sync.ffs_db a "system file", not only a hidden file.
Many people have "show hidden files" in windows, activated.
But system ...
- 10 Mar 2018, 08:59
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: AutoClose when running an Update Batch
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1091
Re: AutoClose when running an Update Batch
When you save the batch file, then remember to check the "auto close"
- 14 Oct 2016, 14:56
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Very Strange issue caused by FFS checks for new version AND fails to connect online.
- Replies: 20
- Views: 3719
Re: Very Strange issue caused by FFS checks for new version AND fails to connect online.
Yes, it's working again :)
- 12 Oct 2016, 10:31
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Very Strange issue caused by FFS checks for new version AND fails to connect online.
- Replies: 20
- Views: 3719
Re: Very Strange issue caused by FFS checks for new version AND fails to connect online.
The website works fine.
But when ffs check for updates, an error occurs, and the entire Lan network can not access the website.
I think it's some kinds of dns error, too.
Cause you can still access the website, from VPN, mobile network etc.
But when ffs check for updates, an error occurs, and the entire Lan network can not access the website.
I think it's some kinds of dns error, too.
Cause you can still access the website, from VPN, mobile network etc.
- 11 Oct 2016, 22:13
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Very Strange issue caused by FFS checks for new version AND fails to connect online.
- Replies: 20
- Views: 3719
Re: Very Strange issue caused by FFS checks for new version AND fails to connect online.
Yes, windows 10 on all computers. BUT there have not been any updates, the last couple of days.
There's windows patchday today, but not installed yet.
There's windows patchday today, but not installed yet.
- 11 Oct 2016, 19:51
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Very Strange issue caused by FFS checks for new version AND fails to connect online.
- Replies: 20
- Views: 3719
Re: Very Strange issue caused by FFS checks for new version AND fails to connect online.
I have the same problem, checked on 6 different pc's.
And 2 different locations.
And 2 different locations.
- 25 Aug 2016, 15:43
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Only SFTP?
- Replies: 50
- Views: 21278
Re: Only SFTP?
Just waiting for ftps.. Then I'll make a decent donation ;)
SFTP is taking way too many resources
SFTP is taking way too many resources
- 29 Jul 2016, 06:29
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Only SFTP?
- Replies: 50
- Views: 21278
Re: Only SFTP?
I'm currently evaluating FTP design alternatives: What are your requirements?
plain FTP (unencrypted)? FTPS (explicit or implicit)? Passive mode? Server text encodings?
If it's not too much trouble, but FTP and FTPS would be very nice.
If only one of those options. Then definitely FTPS explicit ...
plain FTP (unencrypted)? FTPS (explicit or implicit)? Passive mode? Server text encodings?
If it's not too much trouble, but FTP and FTPS would be very nice.
If only one of those options. Then definitely FTPS explicit ...
- 10 May 2016, 09:59
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Only SFTP?
- Replies: 50
- Views: 21278
Re: Only SFTP?
Hi.
Thanks for a great program.
I would really like to have FTPS as an option too. Not FTP (insecure)
Because SSH (SFTP) is not very easy to setup, with a lot of users, on Windows.
Best regards.
Thanks for a great program.
I would really like to have FTPS as an option too. Not FTP (insecure)
Because SSH (SFTP) is not very easy to setup, with a lot of users, on Windows.
Best regards.