Search found 17 matches
- 16 Jun 2024, 20:41
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Bug reporting
- Replies: 14
- Views: 1007
Re: Bug reporting
Didn't realize I hijacked a thread. I thought this was a general bug-reporting thread. That's what showed up when I searched.
- 16 Jun 2024, 20:35
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: enhancement request regardling verification
- Replies: 13
- Views: 522
Re: enhancement request regardling verification
Yes, that's it exactly.
I understand that I could have placed the xml file anywhere, but I didn't, and then I didn't point to it correctly.
Thank you again for your help.
I understand that I could have placed the xml file anywhere, but I didn't, and then I didn't point to it correctly.
Thank you again for your help.
- 16 Jun 2024, 09:59
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Bug reporting
- Replies: 14
- Views: 1007
Re: Bug reporting
Umm, yes, the missing "appdata" was causing the problem.
But it's missing in my invocation line posted above. When I fixed the invocation line, everything works great. Sorry I didn't notice the discrepancy, but posting here is probably what caused me to find it.
So ignore all the above!
But it's missing in my invocation line posted above. When I fixed the invocation line, everything works great. Sorry I didn't notice the discrepancy, but posting here is probably what caused me to find it.
So ignore all the above!
- 16 Jun 2024, 09:58
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: enhancement request regardling verification
- Replies: 13
- Views: 522
Re: enhancement request regardling verification
Well, I found it. In my initial invocation line, there was "appdata" missing between howard and roaming.
So ffs was probably using a default GlobalSettings.xml which turned verify off and confused me into thinking my change was working.
So ffs was probably using a default GlobalSettings.xml which turned verify off and confused me into thinking my change was working.
- 16 Jun 2024, 09:41
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Bug reporting
- Replies: 14
- Views: 1007
Re: Bug reporting
I just noticed in the error popup that where it says "howard\roaming" I would have expected "howard\AppData\roaming".
Perhaps that's a clue to the problem?
Perhaps that's a clue to the problem?
- 16 Jun 2024, 09:25
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Bug reporting
- Replies: 14
- Views: 1007
Re: Bug reporting
I recently discovered the neat verify file switch in GlobalSettings.xml. Running into one problem with it. I turned on verify for most of my syncs, but there are a few where I don't want verify. So I created a GlobalSettingsNoVerify.xml with verification off. I then start ffs via a desktop shortcut ...
- 16 Jun 2024, 09:25
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: enhancement request regardling verification
- Replies: 13
- Views: 522
Re: enhancement request regardling verification
Okay, thank you for all of your help. I will post something in the "Bugs" topic area.
- 16 Jun 2024, 01:10
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: enhancement request regardling verification
- Replies: 13
- Views: 522
Re: enhancement request regardling verification
I spoke a little too soon. There is now a minor, non-critical issue. After the sync completes, I get a popup dialog that says:
Cannot write file "C:\documents and settings\howard\roaming\freefilesync\GlobalSettingsNoVerify.xml.87cb.tmp".
ERROR_PATH_NOT_FOUND: The system cannot find the path ...
Cannot write file "C:\documents and settings\howard\roaming\freefilesync\GlobalSettingsNoVerify.xml.87cb.tmp".
ERROR_PATH_NOT_FOUND: The system cannot find the path ...
- 16 Jun 2024, 01:04
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: enhancement request regardling verification
- Replies: 13
- Views: 522
Re: enhancement request regardling verification
No big automation here. I simply have multiple desktop shortcuts that had a target of (for example):
C:\Users\howard\Desktop\Syncs\SyncEdriveDS412.ffs_batch
When I changed the shortcut target to be:
"D:\Program Files\FreeFileSync\FreeFileSync.exe" "C:\Users\howard\Desktop\Syncs\SyncEdriveDS412 ...
C:\Users\howard\Desktop\Syncs\SyncEdriveDS412.ffs_batch
When I changed the shortcut target to be:
"D:\Program Files\FreeFileSync\FreeFileSync.exe" "C:\Users\howard\Desktop\Syncs\SyncEdriveDS412 ...
- 15 Jun 2024, 07:37
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: enhancement request regardling verification
- Replies: 13
- Views: 522
Re: enhancement request regardling verification
Just for clarity, my usual method of invoking ffs is to have a desktop shortcut with a target of the form:
C:\Users\howard\Desktop\Syncs\SyncName.ffs_batch
but I bypassed that for the above tests.
C:\Users\howard\Desktop\Syncs\SyncName.ffs_batch
but I bypassed that for the above tests.
- 15 Jun 2024, 07:35
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: enhancement request regardling verification
- Replies: 13
- Views: 522
Re: enhancement request regardling verification
I very much appreciate the response. I tried to follow the directions, but it didn't work for me. Perhaps I misunderstood something.
Here's what I did:
1. Created a version of GlobalSettings.xml called GlobalSettingsNoVerify.xml. Edited the latter file to turn the verify setting to false.
2 ...
Here's what I did:
1. Created a version of GlobalSettings.xml called GlobalSettingsNoVerify.xml. Edited the latter file to turn the verify setting to false.
2 ...
- 13 Jun 2024, 07:40
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: enhancement request regardling verification
- Replies: 13
- Views: 522
Re: enhancement request regardling verification
That's a cool idea if I were using a command line. But I have a large number of ffs_batch files controlling my syncs, and I don't see a way to mod the ffs_batch file to use a different globalsettings.xml.
- 13 Jun 2024, 05:14
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: enhancement request regardling verification
- Replies: 13
- Views: 522
enhancement request regardling verification
Recently discovered the capability to enable verification in globalsettings.xml. Nifty feature!
I would like verification even better if I could choose, on a per-sync basic, whether I wanted verification enabled or not. Another setting in the Sync dialog?
Thank you!
I would like verification even better if I could choose, on a per-sync basic, whether I wanted verification enabled or not. Another setting in the Sync dialog?
Thank you!
- 09 Mar 2023, 21:46
- Forum: Help
- Topic: RealTimeSync of only changes
- Replies: 4
- Views: 707
Re: RealTimeSync of only changes
Found other products that can do this, so it is possible that with enhancement RTS could return what was changed, not just that there was a change.
For example, see Directory Monitor.
For example, see Directory Monitor.
- 08 Mar 2023, 22:15
- Forum: Help
- Topic: RealTimeSync of only changes
- Replies: 4
- Views: 707
RealTimeSync of only changes
Considering using RealTimeSync.
Documentation says to configure RealTimeSync by loading an FFS file. RTS then runs on filesystem changes, kicking off the FFS sync. But FFS will then scan the entire source/target directories looking for changes to sync. On large directories this is slow.
When RTS ...
Documentation says to configure RealTimeSync by loading an FFS file. RTS then runs on filesystem changes, kicking off the FFS sync. But FFS will then scan the entire source/target directories looking for changes to sync. On large directories this is slow.
When RTS ...
- 19 Nov 2018, 19:45
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: problem with multiple syncs in one batch job missing files
- Replies: 2
- Views: 592
Re: problem with multiple syncs in one batch job missing files
Thank you, Plerry, but that's the obvious answer. I'm looking for an answer that allows me to have one ffs_batch file. This would need some intelligence in FFS.
I knew this would probably fit as an enhancement request, but I posed it the way I did in case I was missing somethings.
I knew this would probably fit as an enhancement request, but I posed it the way I did in case I was missing somethings.
- 19 Nov 2018, 07:44
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: problem with multiple syncs in one batch job missing files
- Replies: 2
- Views: 592
problem with multiple syncs in one batch job missing files
I've created an ffs_batch file which performs multiple syncs. Here's an example:
<drive1> -> <drive 2>
<drive2> -> <drive 3>
The problem that I see (apparently) is that scanning is performed before copying. Then when the drive2 to drive3 copy is performed, files are missed because drive 2 to drive ...
<drive1> -> <drive 2>
<drive2> -> <drive 3>
The problem that I see (apparently) is that scanning is performed before copying. Then when the drive2 to drive3 copy is performed, files are missed because drive 2 to drive ...