+1 vote to preserve dates and times of directories (very important).
+1 vote preserving ACLs.
Consider making a donation to the project as a bit of a "bounty". I did so and indicated the ACL issue was important to me and this does seem to have gotten some notice by the developer. Perhaps some ...
Search found 18 matches
- 05 Oct 2015, 21:06
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Preserving dates and times of directories
- Replies: 35
- Views: 19774
- 11 Sep 2015, 14:45
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Preserving dates and times of directories
- Replies: 35
- Views: 19774
Re: Preserving dates and times of directories
I found this "feautre" too. Not only times, but directory attributes & permissions / ACLs are not synced if they have changed. This stops me using FFS for my usage :(
I really like to see robocopy like feature to have option to sync directory times and another to sync all directory permissions ...
I really like to see robocopy like feature to have option to sync directory times and another to sync all directory permissions ...
- 16 Jun 2015, 13:35
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Is there a possibility to create log files in gui mode like it is done in batch mode?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 2482
- 09 Jun 2015, 13:44
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Suggestion: All sync.ffs_db files can be put in 1 db file in the FreeFileSync folder
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3446
Re: Suggestion: All sync.ffs_db files can be put in 1 db file in the FreeFileSync folder
Aaron, it is obviously not my call but I think there are enough specifics about your situation that you might need (yet) another thread.
I'm thinking the combination of factors in your case is getting unusual.
As a casual reader I think you want mirror as the main FFS mode but also need moved ...
I'm thinking the combination of factors in your case is getting unusual.
As a casual reader I think you want mirror as the main FFS mode but also need moved ...
- 04 Jun 2015, 21:13
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Suggestion: All sync.ffs_db files can be put in 1 db file in the FreeFileSync folder
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3446
Re: Suggestion: All sync.ffs_db files can be put in 1 db file in the FreeFileSync folder
> in some scenarios FFS may resolve the DFS root to a different namespace server
Are you sure that "two way" is the variant you need? If the data is available multiple times, then it's logically correct that FFS creates multiple database files, one for each physical incarnation of a data set. But ...
Are you sure that "two way" is the variant you need? If the data is available multiple times, then it's logically correct that FFS creates multiple database files, one for each physical incarnation of a data set. But ...
- 04 Jun 2015, 13:52
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Suggestion: All sync.ffs_db files can be put in 1 db file in the FreeFileSync folder
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3446
Re: Suggestion: All sync.ffs_db files can be put in 1 db file in the FreeFileSync folder
There are 4 issues in our scenario:
1. The current location of the sync.ffs_db files is a user readable location under a set of managed folders. While they can't modify/delete the files/folders here the presence of unexpected file data may certainly result in unwanted calls and inquiries to our ...
1. The current location of the sync.ffs_db files is a user readable location under a set of managed folders. While they can't modify/delete the files/folders here the presence of unexpected file data may certainly result in unwanted calls and inquiries to our ...
- 03 Jun 2015, 21:14
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Suggestion: All sync.ffs_db files can be put in 1 db file in the FreeFileSync folder
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3446
Re: Suggestion: All sync.ffs_db files can be put in 1 db file in the FreeFileSync folder
I would like to resurrect and +1 the first item. Can an expert option be included to have all sync.ffs_db files placed into FFS' ProgramData directory rather than at the root of the location being synced? As a Sys Admin the file rename/move detection is a critical piece of why we are hoping to use ...
- 28 May 2015, 19:42
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Please advise preferrable setting for the Global Setting "Copy NTFS Permissions"
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3563
Re: Please advise preferrable setting for the Global Setting "Copy NTFS Permissions"
Maybe have an option that hides advanced settings by default.
- 20 May 2015, 19:30
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: [Feature Request] Implement Security Bypass Privileges (Backup/Restore)
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1914
Re: [Feature Request] Implement Security Bypass Privileges (Backup/Restore)
Wait, the pml file you sent is supposed to be from the test version above? In this case it wasn't running the new copy routine, but this version here should:
[404, Invalid URL: https://freefilesync.org/FreeFileSync_7.1_test2_Windows_Setup.exe]
My apologies for taking so long to respond. I finally ...
[404, Invalid URL: https://freefilesync.org/FreeFileSync_7.1_test2_Windows_Setup.exe]
My apologies for taking so long to respond. I finally ...
- 14 May 2015, 13:46
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: [Feature Request] Implement Security Bypass Privileges (Backup/Restore)
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1914
Re: [Feature Request] Implement Security Bypass Privileges (Backup/Restore)
I received the same results from the test build. Please let me know if you did not receive both event captures I sent you via email.
- 14 May 2015, 03:16
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: FEATURE REQUEST: File-level Log Detail When Deleting Folders
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1185
Re: FEATURE REQUEST: File-level Log Detail When Deleting Folders
+1. I agree that some additional control over the logging format and detail would be extremely useful.
- 13 May 2015, 20:42
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: [Feature Request] Implement Security Bypass Privileges (Backup/Restore)
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1914
Re: [Feature Request] Implement Security Bypass Privileges (Backup/Restore)
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa363852.aspx
There is no mention of backup/restore privileges in this function documentation. There is a community post on the page indicating it doesn't work.
On the other hand, CreateFile very explicitly supports this feature according to the ...
There is no mention of backup/restore privileges in this function documentation. There is a community post on the page indicating it doesn't work.
On the other hand, CreateFile very explicitly supports this feature according to the ...
- 13 May 2015, 20:21
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: [Feature Request] Security Descriptor Update
- Replies: 3
- Views: 703
Re: [Feature Request] Security Descriptor Update
I don't think FFS will copy permissions only
I've seen your bonus pt and think you need another prog.
There are other ways of saying "these files are the same, give them the same attributes".
FFS isn't it
P.S. How do you know the files are exact except for the permissions? Just curious.
Yes, I ...
I've seen your bonus pt and think you need another prog.
There are other ways of saying "these files are the same, give them the same attributes".
FFS isn't it
P.S. How do you know the files are exact except for the permissions? Just curious.
Yes, I ...
- 13 May 2015, 20:11
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: [Feature Request] Implement Security Bypass Privileges (Backup/Restore)
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1914
Re: [Feature Request] Implement Security Bypass Privileges (Backup/Restore)
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa363852.aspx
There is no mention of backup/restore privileges in this function documentation. There is a community post on the page indicating it doesn't work.
On the other hand, CreateFile very explicitly supports this feature according to the ...
There is no mention of backup/restore privileges in this function documentation. There is a community post on the page indicating it doesn't work.
On the other hand, CreateFile very explicitly supports this feature according to the ...
- 13 May 2015, 19:12
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: [Feature Request] Implement Security Bypass Privileges (Backup/Restore)
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1914
Re: [Feature Request] Implement Security Bypass Privileges (Backup/Restore)
I have tested this both interactively and in batch mode. Interactively FreeFileSync is being run using an elevated admin account on the local machine that is also a full administrator on both the source and destination file shares. In batch mode the scheduled task is marked to run with the highest ...
- 13 May 2015, 18:41
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: [Feature Request] Security Descriptor Update
- Replies: 3
- Views: 703
[Feature Request] Security Descriptor Update
In my testing FreeFileSync appears to only perform a sync action if the attributes, size, or data modified do not match. How about including changes made to security descriptors? We have a need to copy modified ACLs (but not the data!) if only the ACL changes.
For bonus points it would also be nice ...
For bonus points it would also be nice ...
- 13 May 2015, 18:31
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: [Feature Request] Implement Security Bypass Privileges (Backup/Restore)
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1914
[Feature Request] Implement Security Bypass Privileges (Backup/Restore)
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa363858%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
I am attempting to do a file sync of multiple directories that have have a Deny-Write permission for "NT AUTHORITY\Everyone". In this scenario FreeFileSync fails with errors, possibly because CopyFileEx does not ...
I am attempting to do a file sync of multiple directories that have have a Deny-Write permission for "NT AUTHORITY\Everyone". In this scenario FreeFileSync fails with errors, possibly because CopyFileEx does not ...
- 13 May 2015, 18:08
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: [Feature Request] Run Hours
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1447
[Feature Request] Run Hours
Please consider adding a feature to pause or throttle file transfer according to a schedule. A simple implementation would be similar to RoboCopy’s /RH switch – allowing for a range of hours during a 24-hour period to be allocated for file transfers while outside of those hours the sync job is ...