FreeFileSync Forum

Hello,

I would agree with rgreat.

There are many reasons for using freefilesync I'm sure and you know better than me the most frequent usage.

However, to sync my desktop and laptop twice a day when arriving/leaving the office (up to 300,000 files across 26,000 folders), running two instances ...

I second that. It also makes freefilesync unusable for me for daily sync between two machines.
Using the NTFS table +the ability to get the file list remotely using a server (to read the NTFS journal remotely) would really expand the usefulness of the software in that scenario.

Hello,

also looking into synchronizing quicky two folders with many files (160000) but only twice a day.
Currently using jfilesync which is not realtime but fast to find the changes (because using a client and a server to get the file lists as opposed to a share).

Seeing how fast everything ...