I've noticed the same behaviour.
The workarount/solution is obvious, but I think FFS should report this in LastSyncs.log
Can I make a plea for a FFS Change Request involving:
- Reporting files ingnored due to a filter. For example:
[HH:MM:SS] Filt: File "filename" ingnored on source
[HH:MM:SS ...
Search found 3 matches
- 29 Jan 2015, 11:19
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Delete ignored files on the target side of a mirror
- Replies: 2
- Views: 552
- 29 Jan 2015, 11:00
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: LastSyncs.log doesn't any longer contain "Synchronizing folder pair" in case of "Nothing to synchronize".
- Replies: 2
- Views: 312
Re: LastSyncs.log doesn't any longer contain "Synchronizing folder pair" in case of "Nothing to synchronize".
Great job!
I've noticed that my request was implemented.
Thank you very much.
I've noticed that my request was implemented.
Thank you very much.
- 06 Nov 2014, 11:08
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: LastSyncs.log doesn't any longer contain "Synchronizing folder pair" in case of "Nothing to synchronize".
- Replies: 2
- Views: 312
LastSyncs.log doesn't any longer contain "Synchronizing folder pair" in case of "Nothing to synchronize".
The current 6.11 version gives no clue at all - as to the folders being synchronized - in case of a "Nothing to synchronize"-situation. Below you'll find an example.
_____________________________________________________
|5-11-2014 - FreeFileSyncTemp: Nothing to synchronize
|
| Items processed ...
_____________________________________________________
|5-11-2014 - FreeFileSyncTemp: Nothing to synchronize
|
| Items processed ...
