"May this be the problem here: The lock file is located in a subdirectory and
thus visible during another synchronization? "
I think that you are on the right track here. My residual file is in a
subdirectory being synchronised within a diectory that is also being
syncronised.
Search found 9 matches
- 22 Sep 2010, 20:06
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Sync.ffs_lock File
- Replies: 40
- Views: 8117
- 27 Aug 2010, 07:43
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Sync.ffs_lock File
- Replies: 40
- Views: 8117
Re: Sync.ffs_lock File
"as it is already excluded during comparison."
Ah....... that is my problem then. Why is it then that the file is not
excluded from synchronisation in me case? It started working fine after I
manually excluded it. Could it be that this because the Batch job I am
launching from was created on an ...
Ah....... that is my problem then. Why is it then that the file is not
excluded from synchronisation in me case? It started working fine after I
manually excluded it. Could it be that this because the Batch job I am
launching from was created on an ...
- 26 Aug 2010, 18:27
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Sync.ffs_lock File
- Replies: 40
- Views: 8117
Re: Sync.ffs_lock File
"At this point the directories are still susceptible to write access: 1. If
sync didn't finish completely, user may try again with the remaining items."
But that seems what is causing my problem. As the files is not deleted a re-
run of FFS (without completely closing FFS) is causing the dreaded ...
sync didn't finish completely, user may try again with the remaining items."
But that seems what is causing my problem. As the files is not deleted a re-
run of FFS (without completely closing FFS) is causing the dreaded ...
- 16 Aug 2010, 21:19
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Sync.ffs_lock File
- Replies: 40
- Views: 8117
Re: Sync.ffs_lock File
Sorry for the late reply but I was busy with work. No the program did not
crash or end unexpectedly. The error is actually 100% reproducible and I think
it is a bug related to having multiple folder pairs with more than one pair
sharing the same source folder (i.e like a folder triangle). the file ...
crash or end unexpectedly. The error is actually 100% reproducible and I think
it is a bug related to having multiple folder pairs with more than one pair
sharing the same source folder (i.e like a folder triangle). the file ...
- 15 Aug 2010, 18:27
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Sync.ffs_lock File
- Replies: 40
- Views: 8117
Re: Sync.ffs_lock File
Thanks, Zenju, but one of the files is stuck in one of my folder pairs even
after the program exits.........
after the program exits.........
- 15 Aug 2010, 10:57
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Date Sync Question
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1096
Re: Date Sync Question
I sometimes use any one of these tools to change the timestamp:
http://www.portablefreeware.com/index.php?sc=82
http://www.portablefreeware.com/index.php?sc=82
- 15 Aug 2010, 00:03
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Sync.ffs_lock File
- Replies: 40
- Views: 8117
Sync.ffs_lock File
Why is the new version of FFS leaving this file within the synchronised
directories? Is this by design or is it some sort of a bug?
directories? Is this by design or is it some sort of a bug?
- 18 Jul 2010, 21:41
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Are There Files Really Different?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1566
Re: Are There Files Really Different?
I vaguely remember something similar happening to me with files that contain
weird characters in their file name. Could this be the problem?
weird characters in their file name. Could this be the problem?
- 04 Jan 2010, 14:39
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Only compare automatically
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3491
Re: Only compare automatically
I would rather, to be honest, click on "compare" to start the process rather
than "Abort" one that has started already. If I understand it clearly then
your request is well catered for using the batch mode anyway. To minimise
clicking one option would be the ability to compare and synchronise at the ...
than "Abort" one that has started already. If I understand it clearly then
your request is well catered for using the batch mode anyway. To minimise
clicking one option would be the ability to compare and synchronise at the ...