Linux mint 19.1
Download and extract file - get FreeFileSync 11.14_install.run. Can't run file, how do I install in linux?
Cannot Install in Linux Mint
- Posts: 5
- Joined: 26 Oct 2021
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 7 May 2021
Hello,
I have the same issue, although on Kubuntu 21.10 to which I recently upgraded to. Prior to that update FreeFileSync was running perfectly well on this very system.
To see any error message I tried to start FreeFileSync via terminal with the command ./FreeFileSync_x86_64 .
The error message that shows up is the following:
./FreeFileSync_x86_64: error while loading shared libraries: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
@AllanK: do you get the same error when trying to launch FreeFileSync via a terminal window?
I have the same issue, although on Kubuntu 21.10 to which I recently upgraded to. Prior to that update FreeFileSync was running perfectly well on this very system.
To see any error message I tried to start FreeFileSync via terminal with the command ./FreeFileSync_x86_64 .
The error message that shows up is the following:
./FreeFileSync_x86_64: error while loading shared libraries: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
@AllanK: do you get the same error when trying to launch FreeFileSync via a terminal window?
- Posts: 5
- Joined: 26 Oct 2021
I cannot even install FreeFileSync, the file I downloaded from Free Sync site - FreeFileSync 11.14_install.run will not run. What is the proper install file?
- Posts: 5
- Joined: 26 Oct 2021
Seems like the download for Linux does not have the complete install files. Has anyone been able to install for linux?
- Posts: 1038
- Joined: 8 May 2006
@Allen, do other .run files run for you?
Appears that depending on how you're doing it, you may need to chmod +x on the .run, first.
Installing .run Packages
@villeneuve, I believe your issue will be different (not that I know Linux), that your are missing some system libraries on your end?
Maybe something along the lines of, error while loading shared libraries: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0: No such file or directory.
(Heh. To me, a .run seems like a bit "convoluted", but in the end, I guess it works.
So you have a .gz which unpacks a .tar which unpacks a .run, which finally gives access to the binaries & other necessities.)
Appears that depending on how you're doing it, you may need to chmod +x on the .run, first.
Installing .run Packages
@villeneuve, I believe your issue will be different (not that I know Linux), that your are missing some system libraries on your end?
Maybe something along the lines of, error while loading shared libraries: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0: No such file or directory.
(Heh. To me, a .run seems like a bit "convoluted", but in the end, I guess it works.
So you have a .gz which unpacks a .tar which unpacks a .run, which finally gives access to the binaries & other necessities.)
- Posts: 5
- Joined: 26 Oct 2021
the .run file is flagged as executable, but linux does not recognize it. Seems odd that the .gz file is the same size as the supposedly compressed .run file it contains. Was the .run file supposed to bring down the binaries and other program files from freefile.org or somewhere else over the internet? In any case this does not seem to be acting like any install file I have used in the past.
- Posts: 1038
- Joined: 8 May 2006
Actually that is not quite right.So you have a .gz which unpacks a .tar which unpacks a .run, which finally gives access to the binaries & other necessities.
.gz, unpacks a .tar, .tar unpacks a .run, .run unpacks some data files, including install.sh, & also another .gz, & it is the final .gz that then contains the actually FFS binaries...
(And yes, all the packed files [.gz .tar .run] are of similar size.)
No.Was the .run file supposed to bring down the binaries and other program files from freefile.org or somewhere else over the internet?
All the same sets of file (names) exist between 11.14 & 11.13.Seems like the download for Linux does not have the complete install files.
(File contents [obviously] differ [for some of the files].)
So, if one were able to install 11.13 I see no reason that 11.14 should not install (disregarding permissions or something like that).
@Allen, I take it you've never had FFS installed on your system before?
How are you attempting to run the file?...install.run. Can't run file
What does happen when you do attempt to run it?
- Posts: 5
- Joined: 26 Oct 2021
Well, I'm embarrassed, needed to run as administrator - installed just fine. The last version I installed some time ago was 10.5 and that did not have a .run file, had to do a manual install. Everything good now.
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7212
- Joined: 9 Dec 2007
This error message is recognized by the FFS launcher. Had you tried to run "FreeFileSync" instead of "./FreeFileSync_x86_64", the output would have been:The error message that shows up is the following:
./FreeFileSync_x86_64: error while loading shared libraries: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory villeneuve, 26 Oct 2021, 21:19
GTK 2.0 was not found! Please install GTK 2, e.g. via:
sudo apt install libgtk2.0 or
sudo yum install gtk2
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7212
- Joined: 9 Dec 2007
Correct, the .run file is already compressed. The whole point of the tar.gz is to preserve the executable bit of the .run file.Seems odd that the .gz file is the same size as the supposedly compressed .run file it contains. Was the .run file supposed to bring down the binaries and other program files from freefile.org or somewhere else over the internet? AllanK, 28 Oct 2021, 02:20
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7212
- Joined: 9 Dec 2007
This doesn't explain why there was no error indication of any kind. If you would go to the terminal and just try to execute the .run file as is, ./FreeFileSync_11.14_Install.run, you should at least get additional information why the installer wasn't able to open a terminal by itself, if only to show an error message.Well, I'm embarrassed, needed to run as administrator - installed just fine. The last version I installed some time ago was 10.5 and that did not have a .run file, had to do a manual install. Everything good now. AllanK, 28 Oct 2021, 17:53