Hello,
I want to synchronize two identical disks, each 6TB in size. One is almost full (there is 142GB of free space). The other is completely empty, cleanly formatted. Both drives have the bins drained. When trying to copy, FreeFileSync shows 5.50TB of space occupied, more than the disk size shown in Windows Explorer. I also tried turning off the safe copy feature, but this had no effect on the size of the data being copied.
Thank you for your help.
Regards
Jan
not enough disk space
- Posts: 5
- Joined: 23 Jul 2023
- Attachments
-
- 2.png (8.18 KiB) Viewed 1649 times
-
- 1.png (114.82 KiB) Viewed 1649 times
-
- Posts: 4867
- Joined: 11 Jun 2019
https://freefilesync.org/faq.php#explorer-mismatch
They could have different block sizes too
They could have different block sizes too
- Posts: 5
- Joined: 23 Jul 2023
The block size is the same for both drives - 512B.
-
- Posts: 4867
- Joined: 11 Jun 2019
I was referring to "Allocation unit size" as Windows calls it
- Posts: 5
- Joined: 23 Jul 2023
The discs are formatted identically - see attachment. And they are exactly the same type. One has data on it and cannot be copied to the second disk.
- Attachments
-
- 3.png (79.34 KiB) Viewed 1623 times
-
- Posts: 4867
- Joined: 11 Jun 2019
In the properties of the G: drive, what is the 'size on disk'?
Also, you may not have followed the link I posted, but there are some possibilities in there
Also, you may not have followed the link I posted, but there are some possibilities in there
- Posts: 5
- Joined: 23 Jul 2023
The G drive properties do not specify the size on the disk. I followed the link you posted, but found no solution.
- Attachments
-
- 4.png (16.09 KiB) Viewed 1608 times
-
- Posts: 4867
- Joined: 11 Jun 2019
Run WizTree on that G: drive. Then we can confirm if Windows is off its rocker again
- Posts: 1202
- Joined: 8 May 2006
two identical disks
Thinking the first is incorrect.FreeFileSync shows 5.50TB of space occupied, more than the disk size shown in Windows Explorer
Thinking the second is correct.
While the may both be "6TB", while they may both be the same "brand", there is difference between the two. (At the least, total sectors is different.)
And the latter message is also likely correct? (May also be correct?)
You're looking to copy "everything" from G: to F:, but "everything" on G: takes up more (albeit very little more) room then there exists in free space on F:.
Exclude "something" from G: (enough such that FFS no longer complains) & your copy should then proceed (without warning). (Or, you could say "ignore" to that message, & "all" will copy - but not entirely all, something [theoretically] will not fit.)
And that said, it is still kind of weird, because G: is not full, using only 5.31 GB of space (which theoretically is less then the available free space on F:).
I suppose your file sizes could also be playing in. Cluster size is 4096 bytes, so a file of 1 byte will actually require 4096 bytes of disk space (1 cluster) [slack space] [& aside from the case where small sized files may end up in the MFT [is it?] instead].
Looked at another way...
(G:) 1465110015 clusters - 37399889 = 1427710126 clusters in use
(F:) 1465055111 free clusters
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7506
- Joined: 9 Dec 2007
FreeFileSync has a tree view panel on the lower left ("Overview"). You can use it to find out where the additional file content is coming from. (Most likely it's hard links, or sparse files)
- Posts: 5
- Joined: 23 Jul 2023
Hello,
there are no sparse files or hard links on the source drive.
The target disk is RAID1 - mirror (two same disks as the source disk), I understand that RAID has some overhead, but it should not be in the order of dozens of GB. There is 140GB free on the source disk.
I copied the source disk from another disk with HTFS+ file system using Tuxera (switching from Mac to PC).
I also tried changing the cluster size to 1024 bytes, but that doesn't solve the problem. There are rather large files on the disk. Maybe a hundred files of 1KB size.
Regards.
Jan
there are no sparse files or hard links on the source drive.
The target disk is RAID1 - mirror (two same disks as the source disk), I understand that RAID has some overhead, but it should not be in the order of dozens of GB. There is 140GB free on the source disk.
I copied the source disk from another disk with HTFS+ file system using Tuxera (switching from Mac to PC).
I also tried changing the cluster size to 1024 bytes, but that doesn't solve the problem. There are rather large files on the disk. Maybe a hundred files of 1KB size.
Regards.
Jan